|
In the reflection titled “Bush in the
Sky”, published by our newspapers this past
March 23rd, I claimed Bush would get
up to his old tricks during the NATO meeting in
the Romanian capital of Bucharest, held from the
1st to the 3rd of April.
Important events are taking place in
Europe. To ignore them would be to remain
ignorant of today’s dilemmas. With enough
patience to get through the next few pages,
readers will have access to news that were
extracted from a sea of information, news which
see the light of day at different times and on
different days, thrown together with other
headlines, vital and not.
Athens, April 3rd (EFE)
According to the EFE, Greek nationalists
celebrated having prevented Macedonia’s entry
into NATO today. At the root of this is the
unresolved Athens-Skopje dispute over
Macedonia’s name, which has been going on for 17
years now.
The Greek press was unanimous, that
Thursday, in calling the veto that prevented
Macedonia’s entry into NATO a success, a
decision that was confirmed today at the summit
meeting that this military organization held in
Bucharest.
Above all else, the media underscored
the intense pressures Washington brought to bear
on the organization to have it accept
Macedonia’s entry into NATO, and expressed a
sense of nationalist pride in noting Athens did
not yield to these pressures.
As a headline of the Athenian newspaper
Avriani announced, Bush’s blackmail did
not go down well, but Kostas Karamanlis will go
down in Greece’s history for the veto against
Bush’s designs.
Bucharest, April 4th (EFE)
The EFE reported that the White House expressed
its satisfaction over the results obtained at
the summit, where the allies promised to base
more troops in Afghanistan, backed US plans to
set up an anti-missiles shield in Eastern Europe
and promised that the Ukraine and Georgia would
be accepted as members of the North Atlantic
Treaty Organization in the future.
Tirana, April 3rd (EFE)
According to EFE's article, Albania’s political
class enthusiastically welcomed NATO's official
invitation for Albania to join the organization.
Albanian members of parliament, who
convened for an extraordinary session, called
the day "historical" and extolled it as the
country’s most important event since the
proclamation of Kosovo’s independence this past
February 17th and the creation of the
Albanian state in 1912.
President of Parliament Jozefina
Topalli thanked all nations that supported
Albania’s entry in NATO and US President George
W. Bush in particular.
The invitation, Topalli said, marks the
end of Albania’s political transition and the
first step towards Euro-Atlantic integration the
country has taken in these past 17 years of
democracy.
Minister for the Economy Genc Ruli
stated that Albania's entry into NATO means more
stability and security and, therefore, more
foreign investment, essential to the economic
development of one of Europe's poorest
countries.
The main streets in the Albanian
capital were embellished today with the flags of
NATO and Albania.
Madrid, April 4th (DPA)
This article opens with a question: Isolated
from the rest of the world? The image of José
Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, sitting alone next to
empty chairs before the table at the NATO summit
meeting, while George W. Bush and other leaders
speak animatedly nearby, was the front-page
photo of the main Spanish newspapers today and
revived debates on the foreign policies of the
Spanish socialist government.
In addition to commenting on the
controversial photograph, newspapers and radio
and television talk shows underscored the
absence of a meeting between Zapatero and Bush,
which La Moncloa had announced as a fait
accompli after the US leader phoned his Spanish
counterpart to congratulate him for his
electoral victory of March 9th.
Bush's relationship with Zapatero has
been cold and distant since the socialist came
to power for, almost immediately after his
election, in April 2004, the latter withdrew the
1,300 thousand Spanish soldiers who were based
in Iraq.
At no point did the United States or
Bush tried to conceal their disapproval towards
this. Since then, there hasn't been a single
bilateral meeting between the two.
Neither Bush has officially visited
Spain since then, nor Zapatero been in the White
House. Just the contrary occurred with the
previous Spanish president, the conservative
José María Aznar…his was one of four faces which
appear in another well-known photo: the one
taken at the Azores summit, in which Great
Britain and the United States hatched the plans
for an intervention in Iraq which Spain
supported.
Exchanges between Bush and Zapatero in
Bucharest were limited to a “Hello, hello,
congratulations”, from the US to the Spanish
leader, which newspapers satirized as the
"three-word encounter".
Bucharest, April 4th (ANSA)
ANSA reports that in his closing remarks at the
NATO summit, US President George W. Bush handed
over the helm to his Russian counterpart
Vladimir Putin on a silver platter.
According to analysts, the US
President’s farewell remarks, which marked the
debut of his French counterpart Nicolas Sarkpozy
and the British Premier Gordon Brown, will be
remembered for Bush’s absurd insistence on
requesting the immediate entry of Georgia and
the Ukraine into the alliance, against the
obvious opposition of the remaining members.
It was "Old Europe", with the
French-German axis at the helm in its criticisms
of the war in Iraq, which levelled a scathing
"no" at President Bush.
The US President appeared unusually
nervous at the Bucharest summit. Diplomatic
sources even speak of harsh words spoken with
his Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, who
tried to convince him of abandoning a "lost
cause", at least at that summit.
Bush’s nervousness was also evident in
his sudden interruption of the press conference
held at Romanian President Traian Basescu's
summer residence, when the European head of
state was attempting to answer a question
concerning US treatment of Romanians who seek to
travel to the United States.
Bush's irritation over the length of
the summit meetings, where the 26 heads of State
took the floor, also came to fore. The president
abandoned the debates on Afghanistan
inopportunely, leaving behind some members of
his team and several journalists who were
covering his trip.
Bush also reacted adversely to a New
York Times article which commented on the
“invisibility” of the US White House chief in
the midst of the electoral campaigns and despite
warnings of an economic recession.
Bush had but one triumph at Bucharest:
securing NATO’s support for his "space shield”
plans with a view to holding a morning meeting
with Putin at the Sochi spa, on the Black Sea.
According to analysts, Bush will have
the opportunity to put some order to the United
State’s conflictive relations with Russia, which
have reached their thorniest point since the
conclusion of the Cold War.
Bucharest, April 4th, 2008 (AFP)
According to the AFP, in a rare cooperative
gesture, Russia arrived at an agreement with
NATO in Bucharest on Friday, to permit the North
Atlantic Treaty Alliance to use its territory to
transport non-military equipment to its troops
in Afghanistan.
The agreement concerning Afghanistan
was the only concrete step taken by the two
parties at the NATO-Russia Council meeting held
on Friday at the Bucharest House of Parliament.
Non-military equipment for ISAF
(International Security Assistance Force based
in Afghanistan) may be transported through
Russian territory, NATO Secretary General Jaap
de Hoop Scheffer said.
The ISAF, led by NATO since 2003, is
today made up of 47,000 officers from 39
countries.
In response to a request for
reinforcements for military headquarters, to
combat ferocious Taliban resistance in southern
and eastern Afghanistan, NATO countries offered
troops that more than substantially swell these
forces.
France, for instance, will send an
additional battalion of some 700 soldiers that
will be deployed in the country's east.
As more troops are deployed and
spending increases, the agreement with Russia
should lower costs, as it will make it possible
to transport, by train, supplies which had
hitherto been sent to Afghanistan by air.
Rogozin, the Russian ambassador to
NATO, had stated that the fate of Russia and
NATO in Afghanistan were interdependent, as both
stood to lose if the Taliban ever returned to
power.
Bucharest, April 4, 2008 (AFP)
Though President George W. Bush affirmed that
the Cold War had ended, AFP tells us, the summit
meeting between NATO and Russia held in
Bucharest this week demonstrated that the former
enemies continue to lock horns over nearly all
issues: Georgia and the Ukraine, Kosovo’s
independence, the anti-missiles shield, Iran and
the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in
Europe.
“NATO cannot guarantee its own security
by expanding to other countries”, Putin told
Western leaders.
The facts are evident: since the end of
the Cold War, NATO's membership has grown from
16 to 28, absorbing nearly all of the former
communist block —Poland, Hungary, the Czech
Republic, Bulgaria, Romania, Slovakia and
Slovenia—and three former Soviet republics:
Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia.
In the heat of this geopolitical
battle, on Thursday Putin managed to convince
the 26 allies to postpone granting Georgia and
Ukraine the candidacy to join the organization,
a move strongly backed by President Bush and a
step towards becoming full members.
But Putin’s partial triumph does not
dispel Russia’s concerns over the fact that NATO
promised these two former Soviet republics that
they would one day join the Alliance.
NATO’s declaration adds to the
questions and preoccupations in Russia with
respect to the direction of NATO’s evolution. A
Russian authority referred to it as an alliance
that assumes global functions, with no limits on
its rights to use force.
Zagreb, April 4th (EFE)
The EFE reports that US President George W. Bush
arrived today at 15:00 hours, local time.
The President’s visit is his first
official visit to Croatia since it declared
independence from the former Yugoslavia.
The US president arrived from
Bucharest, where he attended the NATO summit, in
which Croatia and Albania received official
invitations to join the Alliance.
Croatian authorities announced earlier
today that everything was ready for Bush's
visit, which posed the greatest challenge to the
country's security forces that they had faced to
date.
While these news reached us from the
Balkans, in Europe's south-east, where numerous
countries are fighting over the "honour" of
being devoured by the empire's economic and
financial system in order to improve their
material living conditions, which have nothing
in common with those of the underdeveloped
world, a news cable issued by the EFE on April 2nd
reported the following:
World Bank (WB) President Robert
Zoellick called today for coordinated global
action to address rising food prices which,
coupled to increasingly high energy prices,
threaten to destabilize 33 countries around the
world.
Zoellick referred to this coordinated
action as one of the four measures which need to
be implemented immediately to secure a
sustainable process of globalization and
minimize the effects of today's international
financial crisis on the developing world.
He called for a global trade agreement
at the Doha round of negotiations, which must be
arrived at “now or never”.
He also called for greater transparency
in the raw materials sector in the developing
world, with a view to giving greater impetus to
growth.
His speech, delivered at a hotel in the
US capital on the eve of the WB and IMF spring
meeting to be held in Washington next week,
comes at a moment of great economic uncertainty
for the world.
To achieve all this, we must confront
problems such as skyrocketing basic food prices,
which result, among other factors, from energy
sector recovery.
Zoellic stressed that basic food prices
have gone up by 80 percent since 2005. He
pointed out that, last month alone, the rice and
wheat prices reached their highest, reported in
the last 19 and 28 years, respectively.
The World Bank estimates that 33
countries around the world face potential social
or political crises as a result of high food and
energy prices, he stated.
He pointed out that demographic
conditions, a change in people’s diets, energy
and biofuel prices and climate change suggest
that the high and volatile costs of food will be
with us in years to come.
In view of this situation, he proposed
the creation of what he described as a New
Agreement for a Global Food Policy, which ought
to focus not only on hunger, malnutrition and
access to food products, but also on other
factors such as the connections those prices
have to energy or climate change.
Food policy needs to draw the attention
of the top political circles, because no country
or group of countries can face these
interconnected challenges alone, he concluded.
These two institutions, the World Bank
and the IMF, are part of the imperialist system.
The first news of Bush’s risky trip to
Russia came from the very military plane that
took him and his vast entourage there, to Sochi,
a city on the shores of the Black Sea.
Reporters from several western press
agencies travelled with him.
An AFP cable dated April 4th
reported:
“President George W. Bush told NATO
allies that the United States would send more
troops to Afghanistan next year, Defense
Secretary Robert Gates said Friday.
"(…) The president indicated that he expected
in 2009 the United States would make a
significant additional contribution," he said.
“Gates said bipartisan support for such a move
in the United States was strong enough to allow
Bush to make the pledge even though he will no
longer be president."
From Moscow, an EFE cable dated April 5th
reported:
US President George W. Bush arrived
today in Sochi, where he will consult his
Russian counterpart Vladmir Putin and Dimitri
Medvedev, who will become Russia’s head of State
next May 7th.
The last meeting between Bush and Putin
will focus on Washington’s plans to deploy parts
for its anti-missiles shield in Eastern Europe,
a move which had just met with NATO's support
and to which Russia is resolutely opposed.
Tomorrow, Sunday, the Russian and US
presidents also plan on signing a document that
will set down a strategic framework to guide
relations between the two countries under the
leadership of their respective successors.
The document must be an honest
instrument, for there are problems that cannot
be ignored, said Serguei Prijodko, foreign
policy advisor for the Kremlin chief, as quoted
by the Russian agency Interfax.
He stressed that significant
differences still exist between Moscow and
Washington with respect to anti-missile defence
systems, on strategic arms reduction plans
following the expiration of the START-1 Treaty
and the inadmissible nature of militarizing the
cosmos.
Among these differences, Prijodjo also
pointed out the differing stances on NATO’s
expansion, particularly into the former Soviet
republics of the Ukraine and Georgia.
Bush’s visit to Sochi, the last in his
tour of Eastern Europe, will last less than 24
hours.
On April 5th, the German
agency DPA reported:
Tying lose ends, getting in step with
each other, Presidents George W. Bush and
Vladimir Putin prepare for their meeting at the
Sochi spa, next to the Black Sea, with a view to
sparing their successors political burdens.
It was Bush who chose Putin's summer
residence as the venue for their last meeting:
his parents had been delighted with their
private visit, in 2003, to this mansion, erected
following Stalin’s death. The locality will also
host the 2014 Winter Olympics.
The two presidents availed themselves
of many of their 23 meetings to compliment each
other in public.
But, beneath such personal sympathies,
there are more than enough reasons for political
friction. One of them is the United States'
controversial plan to erect an anti-missiles
defence system in the Czech Republic and Poland.
In Kiev, Bush had cautiously stated he hoped to
find common ground in this dispute.
The Vice-President of Russia's Academy
for Security, Defence and Order, General Viktor
Yessin, affirmed there were reasons for cautious
optimism.
Different kinds of speculations also
surround Bush and Putin’s last meeting: some
believe the presidents plan on an agreement to
construct a means of transportation that will
connect the two countries via Alaska, a project
which had already been conceived in the time of
the tsars.
The media began to speculate on this
when the rich governor of Chukotka, Roman
Abramovich, ordered the largest tunnel boring
drill in the world from the construction company
Herrenknecht.
A Kremlin spokesperson commented on the
rumours surrounding the 42 billion-euro (66
million-dollar) 100-kilometer tunnel.
On April 6th, the French
agency AFP reported:
Putin declared that he was prudently
optimistic about a definitive agreement and that
he felt it was feasible.
Bush stated he wants to establish a
personal relationship with elected Russian
President Dimitri Medvedev that will allow the
two of them to work together on common problems.
Bush, who participated at the NATO
summit in Bucharest on Friday, arrived in Sochi
with the support of the Alliance for the US
anti-missile shield project.
Plans exist to expand the US defence
system with a battery of 10 interceptor missiles
in Poland and an ultra-modern radar in the Czech
Republic, which would be in operations until
2012.
Upon his return to the US capital, the
EFE reported in a cable dated April 6th:
US President George W. Bush returned to
Washington today with much pending work in his
agenda as regards relations with Russia, as he
himself has recognized.
The US – Russia meeting closed with the
signature of a strategic framework agreement
which sets down the major lines that are to
guide future bilateral relations in such areas
as the struggle against terrorism and the
economy.
But the document also clearly reveals
the profound differences that persist between
Washington and Moscow with respect to the
anti-missiles shied that the United States plans
on constructing in Eastern Europe, one of the
thorniest issues in the bilateral relations of
recent months.
Putin declared that the devil hides in
the small-print. It is important for experts to
decide what the guarantee measures will be and
how they will be implemented.
There is also discussion surrounding
matters such as the expansion of NATO towards
the east, particularly towards the former Soviet
republics of the Ukraine and Georgia.
When they met 7 years ago, Bush stated
he had looked into Putin’s eyes and had been
able to glimpse his soul. The two leaders have
maintained a good personal relationship, despite
the deterioration of their country's relations.
Now, Bush and Medvedev have got off on
a different foot. While at their first meeting
the US president welcomed Putin with an embrace,
he only shook his successor's hand. And if he
looked into his eyes and glimpsed his soul, he
certainly didn’t say so, the cable ironically
concluded.
For an immense country such as Russia,
Eastern Europe is not only a place of culture,
art, history and refined sciences or a producer
of well-known wines, goose liver, all imaginable
types of cheese and other exquisite and costly
products from the countryside and city. It is
also a consumer of Russian oil, gas, gold,
nickel and raw materials, an instrument for
capital flight and brain drain, for the
squandering of food products, converted into the
ethanol used by their luxurious and unaffordable
automobiles. The whole world knows this.
Asia is far more important than Europe
for Russia, for Asia’s international trade
institutions, through the Shanghai Group, open
more doors to the World Trade Organization,
where Bush has offered to support Putin in his
aim to have Russia join this organization.
What interest does the United States
have in setting up space bases, radars and
launching platforms in Europe and everywhere, if
it is not in using these to threaten Russia?
Obviously, the weapons it could aim at Russia
could also be aimed at China and all other
countries, without exception, to turn them into
the allies or enemies of an empire whose
economic and political system is unsustainable.
The United States is heading towards
trade protectionism to maintain employment
indices at home, where its employees cannot
compete against the millions of people in the
Third World who, through great sacrifices,
produce quality consumer goods at much lower
costs, goods which transnational corporations
later sell in search of surplus value.
All the while, Bush declares terrorist
whatever countries he pleases.
I decided not to divide this reflection
into two parts, risking a lengthy text.
I have still to address an issue which,
though less significant, I would like to analyze
separately because of its concrete relationship
to our country. I shall do so on a different
occasion.
Fidel Castro Ruz
April 6, 2008
6:45 p.m. |