|
|
|
Press Release by the lawyers of the Cuban Five. |
| |
|
Atlanta, August 20th, 2007
Oral argument in the appeal of Gerardo Hernández,
René González, Antonio Guerrero, Ramón Labañino
and Fernando González, five Cubans unjustly held
in United States’ prisons since 1998, took place
before the three judge panel of the 11th Circuit
Court of Appeals on August 20, 2007.
At the hearing, as at the two prior hearings
held in March 2004 and February 2006, both
parties, the Government and the Defense,
asserted their arguments and responded to
questions from the judges.
This hearing is one more step in the long appeal
process of these five men since they were
sentenced in 2001. As in the past, the
Government of the United States was once again
unable to refute the arguments of the Defense
and sustain the accusations against the five.
For its part, the Defense, demonstrated
irrefutably that the improper conduct of the
Government during the entire legal process
against the five constituted a flagrant
violation of due process that influenced the
entire proceeding, primarily by the way in which
the Prosecutor invented the charges, promoted a
hostile environment and manipulated the evidence
and the jury.
Other key arguments of the Defense that
demonstrate the arbitrariness of the process is
lack of evidence to sustain the two main
accusations "conspiracy to commit espionage and
conspiracy to commit murder in the first degree"
and the imposition of completely irrational and
unjustifiable life sentences. The Government
itself admitted during trial that it could not
present a single secret document to prove
espionage and that it faced an "insurmountable
obstacle" to prove the charge of murder.
Throughout the tainted process the Government
admitted that its real concern was to protect
the anti-Cuban terrorist groups that operate
with total immunity in Miami and to punish those
who fight against them.
Next September 12, these five men, accused of crimes they did
not commit, will begin their tenth year in
prison only because they attempted to protect
Cuba from terrorist acts. Cuba like the United
States and any other country of the World has a
legitimate right to defend itself against the
scourge of terrorism that has harmed so many
victims.
We trust in the professionalism of the panel of judges and
that soon or later justice will prevail for
Gerardo, René, Antonio, Ramón and Fernando.
(Granma)21-08-2007
|
|
|
|
|
Exonerate the Cuban Five, Says Chilean Judge. |
|
|
|
The five Cubans
imprisoned in the United States for preventing
terrorist attacks should be freed, said Chilean
judge Juan Guzman after attending the Monday
hearing at the 11th Circuit Court of
Appeals of Atlanta.
Guzman, who gained
notoriety as the nemesis of ex-dictator Augusto
Pinochet, spoke by telephone with Cuba’s The
Round Table television program to give his
impressions of the hearing, also attended by a
host of prestigious legal experts from around
the world.
"It was made
evident that Miami was not a proper venue for
the [2001] trial because the jury was highly
pressured and even frightened," said the Chilean
judge.
Guzman said the
defense attorneys for the Cuban Five emphasized
the improper conduct of the US government
prosecutors during the trial, "There was neither
impartiality nor objectivity on the part of the
jury," biased by the pressure of the prosecution
for a guilty verdict, he added.
A press release
from the defense said the conduct of the
government was a flagrant violation throughout
the legal proceedings, including the trumped up
charges, the creation of a hostile environment
and the manipulation of evidence and the jury.
The statement
underlines the main points argued at the hearing
that demonstrated the arbitrary nature of a
trial with a lack of evidence to justify the
main charges that led to irrational and
unjustifiable sentences.
The defense team
also emphasized the US government protection
given to anti-Cuban terrorist groups that
operate with total impunity out of Miami.
"After this
hearing, a ruling should be made that
immediately releases these young men from
prison. If these judges want to sleep with a
clean conscience, they should exonerate the
Cuban Five and call for their release," said
Guzman.
Meanwhile, Alicia
Jrapko, representative of the International
Committee to Free the Cuban Five, said the
presence of legal experts from several countries
at the hearing was a great showing of support
for the cause of the Cuban Five.
(Granma)21-08-2007
|
|
|
|
|
Defense Team Presents Convincing Plea in Favor of Cuban Five in Appeal Hearing. |
|
|
|
Reprinted from
Cuban News Agency
Havana, August 21 (acn) A three-judge panel of the 11th
Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta listened on
Monday to the arguments of the defense team of
five Cuban anti-terrorist fighters who remain
unjustly imprisoned in the United States for
monitoring the actions of Miami-based anti-Cuba
terrorist groups, in order to prevent terrorist
attacks against the island.
The defense attorneys denounced that the prosecutors made
serious procedural mistakes and resorted to
intimidatory methods to press the jury of the
trial, held in Miami in an environment clearly
hostile towards Gerardo Hernandez, Fernando
Gonzalez, Ramon Labañino, Antonio Guerrero and
Rene Gonzalez, internationally known as the
Cuban Five.
In a blow to justice, the Cuban Five were convicted June 8,
2001, and sentenced to four life terms and 75
years collectively in December, 2001.
Speaking over the phone with Cuban journalists, Alicia Jrapko,
a member of the International Committee for the
Release of the Five, said that the presence in
the hearing of many international jurists of
great prestige was an important support for the
Five.
Renowned Chilean attorney Juan Guzman, who documented the
cause against former dictator Augusto Pinochet,
was one of those present in the hearing. Also
speaking over the phone, he noted that the US
government was unable to refute the arguments of
the defense, which was immediately reflected by
international media outlets.
According to Guzman, there is no evidence that justifies the
charge of espionage used against the Five or the
charge of "conspiracy to commit murder" against
two of them.
"They also made it perfectly clear that Miami was not the
right place to hold the trial, in which the
defendants were convicted, as the jury members
were scared," stressed Guzman.
"I had the impression - from my experience as a
jurist - that those who know about this cause
should rule in favor of the Five," concluded the Chilean
jurist.
(freethefive.org)
21-08-2007
|
|
|