Embassy of Cuba in the State of Qatar  -  Embajada de Cuba en el Estado de Qatar  -  سفارة جمهورية كوبا في دولة قطر
  

Home

 

   

español

عربي

Press Release by the lawyers of the Cuban Five.

 

Atlanta, August 20th, 2007

Oral argument in the appeal of Gerardo Hernández, René González, Antonio Guerrero, Ramón Labañino and Fernando González, five Cubans unjustly held in United States’ prisons since 1998, took place before the three judge panel of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals on August 20, 2007.

At the hearing, as at the two prior hearings held in March 2004 and February 2006, both parties, the Government and the Defense, asserted their arguments and responded to questions from the judges.

This hearing is one more step in the long appeal process of these five men since they were sentenced in 2001. As in the past, the Government of the United States was once again unable to refute the arguments of the Defense and sustain the accusations against the five.

For its part, the Defense, demonstrated irrefutably that the improper conduct of the Government during the entire legal process against the five constituted a flagrant violation of due process that influenced the entire proceeding, primarily by the way in which the Prosecutor invented the charges, promoted a hostile environment and manipulated the evidence and the jury.

Other key arguments of the Defense that demonstrate the arbitrariness of the process is lack of evidence to sustain the two main accusations "conspiracy to commit espionage and conspiracy to commit murder in the first degree" and the imposition of completely irrational and unjustifiable life sentences. The Government itself admitted during trial that it could not present a single secret document to prove espionage and that it faced an "insurmountable obstacle" to prove the charge of murder.

Throughout the tainted process the Government admitted that its real concern was to protect the anti-Cuban terrorist groups that operate with total immunity in Miami and to punish those who fight against them.

Next September 12, these five men, accused of crimes they did not commit, will begin their tenth year in prison only because they attempted to protect Cuba from terrorist acts. Cuba like the United States and any other country of the World has a legitimate right to defend itself against the scourge of terrorism that has harmed so many victims.

We trust in the professionalism of the panel of judges and that soon or later justice will prevail for Gerardo, René, Antonio, Ramón and Fernando.

(Granma)21-08-2007

 
Exonerate the Cuban Five, Says Chilean Judge.
 

The five Cubans imprisoned in the United States for preventing terrorist attacks should be freed, said Chilean judge Juan Guzman after attending the Monday hearing at the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals of Atlanta.

Guzman, who gained notoriety as the nemesis of ex-dictator Augusto Pinochet, spoke by telephone with Cuba’s The Round Table television program to give his impressions of the hearing, also attended by a host of prestigious legal experts from around the world.

"It was made evident that Miami was not a proper venue for the [2001] trial because the jury was highly pressured and even frightened," said the Chilean judge.

Guzman said the defense attorneys for the Cuban Five emphasized the improper conduct of the US government prosecutors during the trial, "There was neither impartiality nor objectivity on the part of the jury," biased by the pressure of the prosecution for a guilty verdict, he added.

A press release from the defense said the conduct of the government was a flagrant violation throughout the legal proceedings, including the trumped up charges, the creation of a hostile environment and the manipulation of evidence and the jury.

The statement underlines the main points argued at the hearing that demonstrated the arbitrary nature of a trial with a lack of evidence to justify the main charges that led to irrational and unjustifiable sentences.

The defense team also emphasized the US government protection given to anti-Cuban terrorist groups that operate with total impunity out of Miami.

"After this hearing, a ruling should be made that immediately releases these young men from prison. If these judges want to sleep with a clean conscience, they should exonerate the Cuban Five and call for their release," said Guzman.

Meanwhile, Alicia Jrapko, representative of the International Committee to Free the Cuban Five, said the presence of legal experts from several countries at the hearing was a great showing of support for the cause of the Cuban Five.

(Granma)21-08-2007

 
Defense Team Presents Convincing Plea in Favor of Cuban Five in Appeal Hearing.
 

Reprinted from Cuban News Agency

Havana, August 21 (acn) A three-judge panel of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta listened on Monday to the arguments of the defense team of five Cuban anti-terrorist fighters who remain unjustly imprisoned in the United States for monitoring the actions of Miami-based anti-Cuba terrorist groups, in order to prevent terrorist attacks against the island.

The defense attorneys denounced that the prosecutors made serious procedural mistakes and resorted to intimidatory methods to press the jury of the trial, held in Miami in an environment clearly hostile towards Gerardo Hernandez, Fernando Gonzalez, Ramon Labañino, Antonio Guerrero and Rene Gonzalez, internationally known as the Cuban Five.

In a blow to justice, the Cuban Five were convicted June 8, 2001, and sentenced to four life terms and 75 years collectively in December, 2001.

Speaking over the phone with Cuban journalists, Alicia Jrapko, a member of the International Committee for the Release of the Five, said that the presence in the hearing of many international jurists of great prestige was an important support for the Five.

Renowned Chilean attorney Juan Guzman, who documented the cause against former dictator Augusto Pinochet, was one of those present in the hearing. Also speaking over the phone, he noted that the US government was unable to refute the arguments of the defense, which was immediately reflected by international media outlets.

According to Guzman, there is no evidence that justifies the charge of espionage used against the Five or the charge of "conspiracy to commit murder" against two of them.

"They also made it perfectly clear that Miami was not the right place to hold the trial, in which the defendants were convicted, as the jury members were scared," stressed Guzman.

"I had the impression - from my experience as a jurist - that those who know about this cause should rule in favor of the Five," concluded the Chilean jurist.

(freethefive.org) 21-08-2007

 

 


Print
Send to a friend
Back
Your opinion
Close
Top of page
Print page Send to a friend Back Your opinion Close Top of page