|
50 YEARS ON…
Lázaro Barredo Medina
"THE
dictatorship has been defeated. The joy is
immense. And yet, there still remains much to
do. We won’t deceive ourselves by believing that
everything will be much easier from now on;
perhaps it will be much more difficult."
This
is what Commander in Chief Fidel Castro told the
people on January 8, 1959, the day of his entry
into Havana. Many people could never imagine the
immense challenge that they would live to
experience.
Suffice it to say that just a few days later,
Fidel proclaimed the right to self-determination
in terms of relations with the United States and
immediately, the aggressions, attempts on his
life and anger on the part of U.S. politicians
began, evidence of which can be seen in speeches
and articles of the time, as in an editorial of
Time magazine, the mouthpiece of the most
conservative sectors, entitled: "Fidel Castro’s
neutralism is a challenge for the United
States."
But
the Cuban people could not be neutral in the
face of the United States. The triumph of the
Revolution that January 1959 signified for the
Cuban nation, for the first time in its history,
the real possibility of exercising the right to
self-determination. From that moment on, neither
the U.S. president, Congress nor its ambassadors
could continue making decisions on what could or
could not be done in Cuba. The bitter dependence
had been brought to an end; a dependence that
saw U.S. governors and ambassadors enjoying a
degree of power in Cuba that was far greater
than the actual power that they had – with
respect to decision-making – within the U.S.
federal government or in relation to any of the
50 states that make up the U.S.A.
When
full national independence was achieved, the
Revolution began to exercise that right by
immediately applying the program that Fidel had
announced during the Moncada trial of 1953 and
which is contained in his historic self-defense
speech History Will Absolve Me.
Cuba
established the economic and social regime that
it believed was most just and established a
socialist state with participatory democracy,
equality and social justice.
The
country’s economy was characterized by limited
industrial development, essentially depending on
sugar production and a latifundia agricultural
economy, where landowners controlled 75% of the
total arable land.
Most
of the country’s economic activity and its
mineral resources were managed by U.S. capital,
which controlled 1.2 million hectares of land (a
quarter of the productive territory) and most of
the sugar industry, nickel production, oil
refineries, the electricity and telephone
services and the majority of bank credits.
Likewise, the U.S. market controlled
approximately 70% of Cuban imports and exports,
within a system of highly dependent volumes of
exchange: in 1958, Cuba exported products worth
733 million pesos and imported 777 million pesos
worth of goods.
The
prevailing social picture was characterized by a
high unemployment and illiteracy, a precarious
healthcare, social assistance and housing system
for the vast majority of the population, as well
as abysmal differences in living conditions
between urban and rural populations. There was a
high degree of polarization and unequal
distribution of income; in 1958, 50% of the
population earned just 11% of total income,
while a 5% minority controlled 26%. Racial and
gender discrimination, begging, prostitution and
social and administrative corruption were
widespread.
Addressing the social and economic problems in
Cuban society could no longer be put off and
could only be resolved if the Cuban people had
control of their own wealth and natural
resources. Thus, using the 1940 Constitution and
in line with international law, Cuba exercised
its right to take control of these resources and
assumed total responsibility for this action.
The island paid compensation to all nationals
from third countries (Canada, Spain, Britain,
etc.) with the exception of U.S. nationals,
given that that government rejected the
provisions outright and transformed the Cuban
government’s decision into a pretext for
unleashing a war unprecedented in the history of
bilateral relations between the two nations.
Not
only did the Revolution hand over land to
campesinos who, up until then, had been
subjected to semi-feudal conditions of
production and forced to live in extreme
poverty, but it also determined that that all
the country’s resources should be allocated to
national economic development and improving the
material and living conditions of the
population. To give just one example, in the
1980s alone, approximately 60 billion pesos were
allocated to the construction of productive and
social facilities.
The
process of industrialization underway paved the
way for economic and productive diversification.
Under the Revolution and up until the economic
crisis which began with the disintegration of
the Soviet Union and the East European socialist
bloc between 1989 and 1991 – what we in Cuba
call the Special Period – the country’s capacity
for producing steel grew 14-fold, fertilizer
increased six-fold, the oil refining industry
quadrupled (not counting the new refinery in
Cienfuegos), the textile industry grew
seven-fold, tourism three-fold, to mention but a
few. The state also created complete ranges and
new industries such as machinery, mechanics,
electronics, the production of medical
equipment, a pharmaceutical industry,
construction materials, a glass industry and
ceramics, as well as making investments to
increase and upgrade the sugar, food and light
industries. In addition to these endeavors, we
have the development of biotechnology, genetic
engineering and other branches of science.
The
country has also made great efforts in terms of
improving its infrastructure. Electricity
generation has risen eight-fold and water
storage capacity has increased 310 times, from
29 million cubic meters in 1958 to nine
billion-plus cubic meters today. There has been
diversification with respect to roads and
freeways and modernization of ports and other
areas. Social needs have been covered fairly
well, except for housing, which has been Cuba’s
biggest problem.
The
progressive growth and diversification of
productive potential and the application of a
widespread social program has allowed the nation
to confront the problem of unemployment. In
1958, with a population of six million
inhabitants, approximately one third of the
economically active population was unemployed.
Of this figure, 45% of the unemployed lived in
rural areas while, out of 200,000 women in work,
70% were employed as domestic servants. Today,
with 11 million inhabitants, the number of
people in work is in excess of 4.5 million. Over
40% of workers are women and today they
represent more than 60% of the nation’s
technical and professional sectors.
In
1958, the number of illiterate and
semi-illiterate people in Cuba stood at two
million. The average academic level of 15-plus
year-olds was third grade, more than 600,000
children did not attend school and 58% of
teachers were unemployed. Just 45.9% of
school-age children were enrolled and half of
them did not attend classes. Only 6% of those
enrolled finished elementary education.
Universities were available to just 20,000
students.
The
education sector received immediate attention
from the revolutionary government. Its first
task was to develop a masse literacy campaign
with the participation of the population. An
extensive network of schools was constructed
throughout the country and more than 300,000
teachers and professors were in fulltime
employment in this sector. The average academic
level for those aged 15-plus year-olds rose to
ninth grade. One hundred per cent of school age
children are enrolled in schools, some 98%
complete elementary education and 91% complete
junior high. One in every 11 citizens is a
university graduate and one in eight has
technical-professional qualifications. There are
650,000 students in the country’s universities
today and all education is free of charge.
Education and vocational skills are also
guaranteed for 100% of children with physical or
mental disabilities, who attend special schools.
The
precarious situation in 1958 with respect to
public health was characterized by an infant
mortality rate of 60 per 1,000 live births and a
maternal mortality rate of 118 per 10,000. The
mortality rate for those suffering from
gastroenteritis was 41.2 per 100,000, and from
tuberculosis, 15.9 per 100,000. In rural areas,
36% of the population suffered from intestinal
parasites, 31% from malaria, 14% from
tuberculosis and 13% from typhoid. Life
expectancy at birth was estimated at 58.8 years.
Around 61% of hospital beds and 65% of the
nation’s 6,500 doctors were concentrated in the
capital. In the other provinces, medical
coverage was one doctor for every 2,378
inhabitants and there was just one hospital for
all the country’s rural areas.
Today, healthcare is free of charge and Cuba has
more than 70,000 doctors, providing coverage of
one for every 194 inhabitants. Almost 30,000 of
them are providing services in over 60 different
countries. A national network of more than 700
hospitals and polyclinics has been created.
Thanks to a widespread vaccination campaign
(every child currently receives vaccines against
13 different illnesses) diseases such as polio,
diphtheria, measles, whooping cough, tetanus,
rubella, mumps and hepatitis B have been almost
entirely eradicated. The infant mortality rate
is 5.3 for every 1,000 live births and life
expectancy exceeds 77 years.
There is also a series of advanced medical
services that are not considered as "basic" in
the international arena, and are provided
completely free of charge, such as intensive
care units in pediatric and general hospitals,
cardiovascular surgery, transplant services,
special perinatal care, treatment for chronic
renal failure, and special services for
occupational and physical rehabilitation.
The
revolutionary state did not focus its attention
solely on economic and social measures. It also
embarked on efforts to establish an internal
legal system to facilitate the right to
self-determination via the population’s direct
participation in discussions, analyses and the
passing of the country’s principal laws. The
most notable of these was the 1976 Constitution,
supported by 97% of Cubans aged 16 and over
through a referendum, as well as other momentous
laws like the Penal Code, the Civil Code, the
Family Code, the Children and Young People’s
Code, the Labor and Social Security Code and
many others.
Likewise, the self-determination of the Cuban
people is expressed through the right to defend
the nation against foreign aggression. Today,
more than four million Cubans – workers,
campesinos, and university students – are
organized in militia groups have access to
weapons in their
campuses, factories and in rural areas.
However, since 1959, Cuba has had to confront
the hostility of 10 U.S. administrations that
have attempted to limit its right to
self-determination through the use of aggression
and the unilateral imposition of a criminal
economic, commercial and financial blockade.
One
of the universally accepted principles of
international law is that state cannot be
allowed to coerce another in order to deny it
the right to exercise its sovereign rights.
Article 24 of the UN Charter states that, in the
context of international relations, nations must
refrain from using threats or force against the
territorial integrity or political independence
of any state.
Over
the past 45 years, the United States has
prohibited any trade with Cuba, including
foodstuffs and medicines; it cancelled the Cuban
sugar quota; prohibited its citizens from
traveling to Cuba via the imposition of heavy
sanctions; prohibited the re-export of U.S.
products or items containing U.S. components or
technology to Cuba from third countries;
prescribed that banks in third countries should
maintain Cuban bank accounts in dollars or use
that currency in their transactions with the
Cuban nation; has systematically intervened to
prevent or hinder trade with or financial
assistance to Cuba on the part of governments,
institutions and citizens from other countries
and international organizations.
In
the 1960s these reprisals forced Cuba to
structurally reconstitute its economic relations
when and establish its essential markets in
countries in the former East European bloc –
specifically in the Soviet Union – which meant
that the country had to embark on an almost
total re-conversion of its industrial
technology, means of transport, and provisions,
etc.
When
Cuba lost its natural markets in Eastern Europe,
the U.S. government intensified its blockade via
the 1992 Torricelli Act, which used the pretext
of "democracy and human rights" to prohibit U.S.
subsidiaries located in third countries and
subject to the laws of those nations from
engaging in commercial or financial operations
with Cuba (particularly in respect to food and
medicines), and punishing these by prohibiting
the entry into U.S. ports for 180 days of
vessels transporting goods to or from Cuba or on
behalf of Cuba, measures that – given their
extraterritorial nature – do not just prejudice
Cuba but also harm the sovereignty of other
nations and the international freedom of
transportation.
On
March 12, 1996, the U.S. government passed the
Helms-Burton Ac, further aggravating relations
between the two countries and assuming the right
to sanction citizens of third countries in U.S.
courts, as well as determining their expulsion
or denying them and their families entry visas
into the United States, with the aim of
hindering Cuba’s efforts to recover its economy
and hampering its possibilities of securing a
greater insertion in the international market.
That was also a way of attempting to pressure
the Cuban people into relinquishing their
efforts of self-determination.
More
recently, it has adopted the Bush Plan, an
attempt to transform Cuba into a colony through
an annexationist program and the sibylline
intention to intervene via a pretext of
"transition," a scenario in which the State
Department would entrust one of its leaders as
"governor," when the Cuban revolutionary state
disappears. This plan, with which George W. Bush
decided "to precipitate the day when Cuba
becomes a free country," has intensified the
blockade and pressure on the Cuban people by
repressing family relations between Cubans
resident in the United States and their families
on the island; grants million-dollar resources
to terrorist groups in Miami, as well as to
mercenary subordinates in the U.S. Interests
Sections in Havana; and promotes formulas to
destabilize the country and redouble
international pressure on the island.
That
hostility on the part of the U.S. has included
other notorious manifestations of aggression,
ranging from the military aggression through the
Bay of Pigs in 1961, the dirty war carried out
by counterrevolutionary gangs heavily supplied
by the U.S. CIA, bacteriological warfare on
agricultural crops (sugar, tobacco, and citric
fruits), animals (swine fever), and humans
(hemorrhagic dengue), to sabotage plans,
bombings using pirate planes, and assassination
attempts on the country’s principal leaders.
The
actions of terrorist organizations executing
military attacks on Cuba from U.S. territory are
notorious, and are publicized and fomented by
the Miami media. Groups are constantly
recruiting adventurers who are willing to head
off to Cuba as agents and saboteurs, who openly
declare that they have no fear whatsoever of
being brought to justice in U.S. courts.
That
is why Cuban patriots have had to leave aside
their personal interests to serve those of the
nation, even sacrificing their family
relationships, in order to infiltrate the ranks
of those terrorist groups in order to discover
their activities and, with this information,
prevent the bloodshed of Cuban and U.S. people.
They are willing to pay the price of the
political irrationality of the U.S. government,
as is the case of the five Cuban heroes unjustly
incarcerated in U.S. jails for combating
terrorism.
The
above is compounded by the heavy military
mechanism created by the United States around
Cuba and its constant tension-generating
activities, as well as the illegal occupation of
the Guantánamo Naval Base on Cuban territory
(today converted into a horrific prison camp), a
part of Cuba rented out by force to the United
States in the early 20th century and which the
U.S. government refuses to return.
In
the early 90’s, with the disappearance of the
Soviet Union, isolated and reviled by the
international reaction, Cuba absorbed the
terrible blow of losing the bulk of its markets
in a matter of months and an abrupt descent in
its gross domestic product. But the island
confirmed that it shone with its own light and
that it had never been a satellite of anyone,
given that it was able to face that juncture on
account of the extraordinary resistance of the
majority of Cubans, who have acted on the basis
of authentic motivations, values and ethical
principles.
The
Cuban people have made a conscious decision to
support the country’s leadership, not only
because they identify the system with their own
interests, but also because of the responsible
manner in which the state took on the crisis,
reorganized its forces and designed a recovery
strategy, despite the U.S. blockade and
conditions imposed by its European allies.
The
sacrifices provoked by that situation have been
hard, but it has been possible to endure them
because of the undisputed social advances
attained, because of the confidence deposited in
the country’s leading institutions and because
of people’s appreciation that their government
is not a decadent one or one that is in
management crisis or lacking in strategies, but
has confirmed that the population has remained
at the center of all its work, even in the most
difficult circumstances.
Fifty years have gone by and the liberation
process has reached this point following the
same direction indicated that night, 50 years
ago, when Fidel, speaking to the huge crowd
awaiting him in what was the dictatorship’s
headquarters, affirmed that everything could be
more difficult in the future, because we would
have to fight to make the Revolution.
That
is the challenge of the struggle currently
underway to eradicate vices and exalt virtues,
with Fidel as a soldier of ideas serving as a
compass in the fight for freedom and
independence.
Cuba’s enemies are backing their all on the
opposite of that. In this world, where politics
is a caricature, they cannot comprehend that, in
its thinking and action, this Revolution is a
process of continuity, and that Fidel will
continue to be the leader of the Revolution of
today and tomorrow, because, beyond
responsibilities and titles, he will continue to
be the counselor of ideas to which we will
always have recourse, because he has transcended
political life to insert himself in an intimate
way in the family life of the vast majority of
Cubans.
Granma 30-12-2008 |